President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he accepts the conclusion of U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia sought to influence the 2016 U.S. election.
“I accept our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place. Could be other people also. A lot of people out there,” Trump told reporters in remarks from the White House.
His comments come a day after the president publicly accepted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denial that Moscow was involved in election interference, drawing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers for taking the foreign leader’s word over his own intelligence agencies.
The president said that after he reviewed a transcript of his Helsinki remarks, he said he realized he misspoke.
“In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word would instead of wouldn’t. The sentence should have been…’I don’t see any reason why it WOULDN’T be Russia,” he said.
The president continued to assert Tuesday that the media misrepresented his remarks while traveling abroad.
On Capitol Hill, House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, responded to Trump’s rosy assessment.
“Let’s be very clear: Russia meddled in our election,” Ryan said. “We know they interfered with our elections, and we have passed sanctions on Russia to hold them accountable.”
When asked about election meddling during a joint news conference with Putin on Monday, Trump said, “President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,” adding that “President Putin says it’s not Russia. I don’t see any reason why it would be.”
A day later, U.S. lawmakers continued to condemn Trump’s performance.
“It’s almost as if Donald Trump is embracing Putin’s knees. I’m ashamed of it. Every American should be,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said. “Can you imagine if President Kennedy believed Khrushchev when he said there were no missiles in Cuba?”
Some Republicans have come to Trump’s defense. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky said “The President has gone through a year and a half of totally partisan investigations — what’s he supposed to think?
“I trust our intelligence community. I trust their assessment that there was Russian meddling in the election,” the Senate’s No. 2 Republican, John Cornyn of Texas, said. “But I also trust the [Russia] investigation so far, which has shown absolutely no collusion with the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence activity leading up to the [2016] election.”
Democrats are demanding action to rein in Trump and counter Russia, from congressional hearings on the Helsinki summit to ramped up sanctions against Russia to legislation protecting the special counsel in the Russia investigation, Robert Mueller.
“Words are not enough. Our response to the debasement of American interests before a foreign adversary demands a response not just in word but in deed,” Schumer said. “Our Republican colleagues cannot just go ‘Tsk, tsk, tsk.’ They must act.”
“I think there’s a lot we can do together,” Cornyn responded. “But as long as this becomes a political, partisan, stop-Trump-at-all-costs effort, I don’t think we are going to make much progress.”
Meanwhile, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Tennessee Republican Bob Corker, told reporters he expects Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to testify on Russia as early as next week.
Some Trump critics called on his key national security aides to quit in the face of the president saying that he had “confidence” in both Putin and the U.S. intelligence community.
Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, asked in a Twitter comment, “If you’re on the Trump national security team, and you’ve been out there saying how strong Trump is on Russia and how serious our commitment is to NATO, how do you not resign after the last four days?”
There has been no indication so far that any of Trump’s key aides planned to quit.
– – –
Ken Bredemeier contributed to this report
It’s not like Trump went to a baseball game with Putin.
What a load – by all. Of course Russia would have interest in the outcome of the USA elections and make reasonable efforts to influence the elections to favor the candidate that they think will be in Russia’s best interest. We in the USA, and all the world powers of any consequence, do the same. Does Israel? Of course they do, and AIPAC is one of our most powerful domestic PACs.
Why not ask those senators and representatives that are on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/) and the representatives that are on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (https://intelligence.house.gov/) – note that Schumer and Corker are not) “How many programs does the US Intelligence currently engage in which may be construed as an attempt to influence elections in sovereign nations?”
Our history is that we not only actively engage to influence elections (post-WWI Italy for example), we have also toppled elected governments to favor regimes that we believe would be more in the interests of our country, or sometimes just our country’s business interests – Guatemala, Iran, Chile, and Panama come to mind. We had the Contra program in Nicaragua, our current meddling in the internal affairs of various and sundry Middle East regimes – and so on.
The real question is: “Did either campaign initiate contact with a foreign power in an attempt to influence the election?” On that score, the Democrats have a lot more egg on their face than the Republicans…and that’s the crux of the investigation into the so-called “Dirty Dossier” – it shows the collusion of the Democrats with an ex-employee of a foreign intelligence service to gin up a load of nonsense, and then circulate that into the U.S. Intelligence Community – the one Republican that is most at fault in that is Sen. McCain and the agency of the US Government most at fault is the FBI.
We’re wasting an enormous amount of time, money and energy on this giant nothingburger – enough already.
Absolutely, corruption always lives by a double standard values